Skip to content

Navigating HPR Culture

How to build alliances, avoid landmines, and operate well inside the village

Working status
This chapter is based on one onboarding phone call and should be treated as a working guide, not final legal, tax, insurance, food-safety, or permit advice. Exact fees, contacts, deadlines, and rules should be verified with current HPR leadership, the City of San Diego, and the appropriate compliance professionals before each event.
Purpose of this document
This chapter captures the informal side of HPR: relationships, politics, reputation, security, and cultural expectations. The phone call made clear that success is not only about following rules. The House also needs to build trust inside a long-standing community of cottages and leaders.
The village dynamic
The participant described HPR as a small village where people talk, reputations form quickly, and operational mistakes become known. This is not necessarily negative. It simply means House of Afghanistan should act with consistency, humility, professionalism, and follow-through from the beginning.
Relationships to prioritize
Several people and houses were named as useful relationships because they have experience, resources, or strong fundraising/event knowledge. The goal is not transactional networking. The goal is mutual respect, learning, collaboration, and practical support.
Table 11
Relationship
Why it matters
House of Panama / Yolanda Burgess
Mentioned as an experienced relationship to build.
House of China / David
Described as a strong source of knowledge.
House of Germany / Leanne Mendemuller
Mentioned as an experienced organization with fundraising capability.
House of Sweden
Potential access to outdoor furniture and event experience.
House of Finland
Mentioned as having useful chairs/resources.
House of England
Mentioned as having chairs that may be borrowable.
House of Iran
Mentioned as having tables/chairs and experience with larger events.
House of Lebanon
Uses formal Prado rooms and has event experience.
There are no rows in this table
Borrowing and resource-sharing
New houses often do not own event infrastructure. Chairs, tables, dance floors, tents, and sound equipment can become expensive. Relationship-building may allow the House to borrow or rent items from other cottages for a small donation or deposit.
Borrowing etiquette
Ask early.
Be specific about date, quantity, pickup, return, and condition.
Offer a donation even if not required.
Return items clean and on time.
Assign one person responsible for borrowed items.
Thank the lending house publicly or privately.
Open vs closed cultural model
The call discussed differences between houses that are more open to non-members of that culture and houses that are more closed. The stated ideal is that cottages should be open to people who want to learn about the culture. House of Afghanistan should intentionally choose an open, educational model.
This aligns with the House’s mission. The House is not only a social club for Afghans. It is a cultural institution that preserves and shares Afghan philosophical, intellectual, artistic, and cultural heritage with the broader San Diego community.
Children and families
Children’s programs were emphasized as important. Houses that engage children are investing in their future. This is especially relevant for House of Afghanistan because language, cultural memory, and identity often depend on intergenerational participation.
Create children’s dance opportunities if possible.
Offer Afghan Farsi games or simple language activities.
Create craft tables for public events.
Use school visits as an educational pipeline.
Invite families to participate, not only attend.
Design volunteer roles for youth and high school students.
Political and security sensitivity
The call raised a serious blind spot: public cultural events can attract political disruption. Houses associated with politically sensitive regions have experienced protests or hostile comments. The participant specifically referenced issues faced by Israel, Palestine, and Syria, and suggested that House of Afghanistan may need to think similarly.
This is not a reason to avoid public programs. It is a reason to plan calmly. The House should focus messaging on Afghan people, heritage, culture, education, and diaspora community. It should avoid turning public cultural programs into geopolitical forums.
Security planning checklist
For larger events, ask HPR for the police contact who supports HPR events.
Consider requesting visible police or ranger presence for sensitive or high-attendance events.
Train volunteers not to argue with disruptive attendees.
Have one designated escalation lead.
Keep public remarks cultural and educational.
Avoid signage or statements that could be interpreted as partisan or inflammatory.
Document incidents after the event.
Public messaging posture
The House should consistently describe itself as celebrating Afghan philosophical, intellectual, and cultural heritage. This keeps the focus on Afghan people and civilization, rather than current state politics. It also gives non-Afghan visitors a clear way to engage respectfully.
Internal conduct inside HPR
New houses should avoid appearing disorganized, combative, or dismissive of established practices. At the same time, the House should not be passive. It should ask questions, document answers, attend meetings, volunteer, and build a reputation as competent and collaborative.
Operating principle
Inside HPR, relationships are infrastructure. A house with strong relationships can borrow chairs, learn permit shortcuts, get advice, avoid mistakes, coordinate security, and find partners. A house without relationships must figure everything out alone.
Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ··· in the right corner or using a keyboard shortcut (
CtrlP
) instead.